Tags: #adhesives #buildingmaterials #buildingproducts #buildingscience #flashings #materialsscience #waterresistance
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40952/40952fcfb39d186ee2dc42c80043ac5dbec1855d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df571/df5713d70ad783f34c434a7c9edce5a162d73678" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/651c0/651c037ef3ea2c23471f43bb8554cd11ba7c30e3" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fb02/8fb02c01dbc46e20ecc7ebdc58a09e32c3bc706a" alt=""
Beyond water resistance: the adhesion properties of WRBs and liquid flashing.
Having perspective on how WRBs resist water, I am now turning my attention to adhesion properties of WRBs and liquid flashing. Many liquid-applied or pre-coated systems absorb water. Their adhesion properties are also affected by water. And forget about aluminum substrates per AAMA 711/714. I’m talking about real substrates – wood, gypsum, concrete, and magnesium oxide.
I’m using various methods, including face columns, ponding tests, saturated interfaces, and inverted immersion tests – as shown here. Where fastener treatment is not required, this too is considered.
Some fascinating insights have emerged and I’m sure there are many more to come.